The effect of the coronavirus lockdown measures mean that many people are either off work or out of work whether that is on furlough or subsequently made redundant but, in both cases, there is a significant reduction in incomes.
It will not come as a surprise to most but, at the moment, we have a clear tie with our legal profession in the EU.
If there is a ‘deal’ then the current arrangements are expected to continue for the transition period but what happens if there is ‘no deal’ and the EU do not consent to an extension of time?
If a couple decide to divorce and they are EU citizens of a member state but work in another member state, the issue of which state they divorce in is governed by EU Council Regulation 2201/2003 (also known as Brussels II A or Brussels II bis).
Under this regulation, and simply put, whoever files at court an application first in time in one EU state then that state has jurisdiction to deal with both the divorce and the financial aspects. This is because of the reciprocal arrangements between all the EU member states.
That said, there are provisions to enable a jurisdiction i.e. a court in England And Wales, to "stay" (put on hold) proceedings if that court decides that another member state jurisdiction will be a more appropriate forum to conclude the proceedings.
Presently, there are many optimists amongst us that hope, between now and 29 March, a bespoke negotiated arrangement can be put in place however and as many suspect, time is running out to enable a meaningful agreement to be put in place and there seems to be little appetite, on part of the other EU member states, to finalise such an agreement.
If there is no deal, then the "first in time" rule will not apply. At present, the government is working to replicate the current EU instruments into UK law on the assumption that there will be a reciprocity from the remaining EU members, which would mean that the effects of the current regulations continue. If that does not happen then the UK will have to recognise a decision by an EU court but there is no such requirement on the remaining EU members’ jurisdictions to recognise such a decision being made by a court in the UK.
It is anticipated that the likeliest ‘no deal’ option will necessitate repealing the current EU instruments, including the regulations, mentioned above and that would mean that we would have to revert to the pre-EU rules; in other words, the UK will be treated exactly as all other non-EU countries.
The Hague 1970 Divorce Recognition Convention, which would be the default rules, only apply to some of the EU member states and they may well recognise the UK divorce however it cannot be taken that the UK divorce will be automatically recognised in all EU member states.
Emotional strain, time taken and costs could be further impacted by having to duplicate proceedings and to deal with potentially irreconcilable decisions being made in different jurisdictions. The government is currently suggesting that ongoing divorce cases will continue under the existing rules but there is no guarantee the EU member state jurisdictions will act in the same way and recognise any judgement stemming from the existing cases.
Presently, there are arrangements in place to deal with the jurisdiction and enforcement of maintenance awards between EU member states; the EU Maintenance Regulation (Council Regulation 4/2009) provides the framework but, and in some circumstances, couples may agree, in advance, where any dispute about maintenance is to be decided.
If there is no deal then this regulation would also, more than likely, be repealed. That said, on 28 December 2018, the United Kingdom signed and ratified the “Hague Convention of 23 November 2007” on the “International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance” and this is in preparation for the possibility of there being no deal on 29 March 2019. The convention comes into force in the UK on 1 April 2019 and in short, effective remedies are available for existing maintenance arrangements.
It is difficult to predict what the future holds however if there is going to be ‘no deal’ it is very likely, and possibly inevitable, cross jurisdictional EU divorces will become highly complex, costly and involve protracted legal battles. There are already cases where concerns are being raised about potential changes to domestic tax rules (for example entrepreneurs’ relief) immediately, or as soon as practicable, after 29 March 2019.
Practitioners should strongly consider expediting proceedings for divorce, financial remedies and children arrangements so that orders are in place and any registration requirements are complied with before the exit date.
In addition, for consideration needs to be given when drafting cohabitation, prenuptial and also post-nuptial agreements.
For further information on this topic or any other matter, please contact Tariq M Ahmad FCILEx by telephone (+44 279 758080) or email (tariqahmad@pellys.co.uk).
If you have separated from your partner, you may be tempted to try to resolve the financial issues arising out of the separation without involving lawyers. There is a misconception that by appointing a lawyer, he/she will “add fuel to the fire” or create further animosity and charge an absolute fortune.
18 The Causeway, Bishop’s Stortford, Herts CM23 2EJ
T: 01279 758 080 E: info@pellys.co.uk
Audley House, 9 North Audley Street, Mayfair, London W1K 6ZD (By appointment only)
T: 020 7495 0555 E: info@pellys.co.uk
Following a review of the current position, we are pleased to announce that from Wednesday 13th May all of our offices will once again be fully staffed and operational. All that we do ask is that for the time being all visits to our offices be by appointment only and even then only when they are necessary. If you are unsure if your visit is necessary then please do not hesitate to ask us.
As we emerge from the current crisis, you may rest assured that we at Pellys will do all we can to assist you with your legal requirements and provide all the support you need.